Looking for a morphological model for the urban evolution of Managua

Abstract

"Now I let the patient determine the subject of our daily work, and so I start from the surface that the unconscious offers for the time being, and I am getting fragmented, interwoven, in different contexts and distributed between very distant eras all the material corresponding to the solution of a symptom, but in spite of this apparent disadvantage, the new technique is far superior to the primitive one, and without dispute, the only possible one.For the incompleteness of my analytical results, I was forced to To imitate the example of those fortunate investigators who manage to extract the remains, not by less precious mutilations, from past times, completing them later by deduction and according to already known models.I decided, therefore, to proceed, analogously, although noting always, like an honest archaeologist, where the authentic ends and the reconstructed begins.
Of another different insufficiency, I am directly and intentionally guilty. Indeed, I have not exposed, in general, the work of interpretation that had to fall on the associations and communications of the patient, but only the results of it. In this way, and except in regard to dreams, only in some points does the technique of analytic investigation appear detailed. With this clinical history I was especially interested in showing the determination of the symptoms and the internal structure of the neurosis. An attempt to carry out the other work simultaneously would have produced an irremediable confusion, since in order to substantiate the technical rules, empirically found for the most part, it would have been indispensable to present together the material of many clinical histories. However, in the present case, it should not be believed that the omission of the technique has shortened its exposure. "