Quality management in the Continuing and Postgraduate Education Unit (QMCPEU) of the Regional Multidisciplinary Faculty of Carazo, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Managua.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/rtu.v11i32.14974

Keywords:

Quality management, educational quality models, quality deployment function, service culture

Abstract

The purpose of the research is the analysis of the factors that determine quality management at the Continuous and Postgraduate Education Unit (QMCPEU) of the Regional Multidisciplinary Faculty of Carazo, of the National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Managua, from the perspective of the actors involved; and students, teaching staff and management teams, considering that institutions of higher education at the graduate level should establish a program of continuous improvement.

The study involves the description of the context of quality management in higher education, the approach of the factors for
quality management, the knowledge of the perception of quality management, through the triangulation of information between
governing bodies, users, and teachers, in addition to the opinion of experts in the area of study.

As for the methodology, this research is developed under a positivist paradigm with a quantitative approach, so the data provided by the key actors are described and analyzed.

As a result, it was found that the QMCPEU faces limitations related to curricular improvement, human talent management, administrative and financial efficiency, the effectiveness of the teaching-learning process, provision of infrastructures, technological equipment, graduate monitoring processes, and especially the lack of a culture of service. Finally, the proposal of the management model for quality service culture "CLOSER" is presented, which has a humanistic approach to the organization oriented towards the user.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
275
PDF (Español (España)) 214
HTML (Español (España)) 80
VISOR (Español (España)) 0

References

Arenas, L. y Luna, M. (2008). Calidad y competencias; Propuesta de un modelo educativo en la educación superior. Obtenido de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=553756884007

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. California: Psychometrika

Domínguez, G. (2003). El modelo de verificación de escenarios organizacionales (VERO) y su aplicación a programas de formación multimedial. Revista Complutense De Educación, 75 - 138.

Escobar, J., & Cuervo, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización.

Gento, S. (2002). Instituciones educativas para la calidad total. Madrid: La Muralla.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. México D.F: McGraw-Hill.

Pichardo, J. (2007). El estudio de las expectativas en la universidad: análisis de trabajos empíricos y futuras líneas de investigación. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 27.

UNAN, Managua. (2004). Reglamento del Sistema de estudios de Posgrado y educación continua. Managua: UNAN, Managua.

UNAN, Managua. (2015). Plan Estratégico Institucional 2015-2019. Managua: Tutecotzimí

Published

2022-10-21

How to Cite

Medrano Chávez, R. A. . (2022). Quality management in the Continuing and Postgraduate Education Unit (QMCPEU) of the Regional Multidisciplinary Faculty of Carazo, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Managua. Torreon Universitario Magazine, 11(32). https://doi.org/10.5377/rtu.v11i32.14974

Issue

Section

Education